Yet More Lies from the Slimy Sunday Express

Not content with lying about Nick Griffin, the Tory-supporting Sunday Express newspaper has told what might be the biggest lie of its existence by claiming that a BNP “electioneer tried to blow up a mixed school.”

Trumpeting their lie as an “exclusive,” the Sunday Express article claims that Dr Lambertus Nieuwhof is “helping to mastermind the BNP’s election campaign.”

Dr Nieuwhof is, according to the lying Sunday Express, “part of the BNP’s election taskforce. Nieuwhof, who lives in Hereford, is working on the general election campaign in Scotland.” The paper goes on to claim that Dr Niewhof “planted a bomb” in a school in South Africa.

In fact, Dr Nieuwhof has not even been a member of the party for over two years and has never had anything to do with the BNP’s “election campaign.”

Furthermore, Dr Niewhof has obtained a police clearance certificate from the South African Police proving that he has no criminal record whatsoever.

The truth is that Dr Nieuwhof used to have a web hosting company which three years ago hosted a London pro-BNP blog, but he sold that company two years ago and has not been involved in the BNP either as a member or activist of any sort since then.

It is understood that Dr Nieuwhof is currently planning legal action against all those media hacks who repeated the leftist lies and inventions about himself.

* According to the “Editor’s Code of Practice,” a copy of which is on the Express’s own website, that paper is committed to accuracy.

The Code reads:

“1. Accuracy

i) The press must take care not to publish inaccurate, misleading or distorted information, including pictures.

ii) A significant inaccuracy, misleading statement or distortion once recognised must be corrected, promptly and with due prominence, and -- where appropriate -- an apology published.

iii) The press, whilst free to be partisan, must distinguish clearly between comment, conjecture and fact.”

Obviously, the slimy editors of the Sunday Express do not abide by their own code -- but that will come as no surprise to any person familiar with the media.

As Postal Strike Grips Britain, Tories Promise to Make Matters Worse

In a classic case of applying fuel to a fire, Conservative shadow business secretary Kenneth Clarke said on Wednesday that his party would not protect Royal Mail’s market — which is the answer to the problem — but rather dilute it further through privatisation.

Mr Clarke’s announcement was made on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme. He said that the Royal Mail was “broke” and its future had to involve a change of culture to stop business “draining away.”

In reality, as discussed earlier on this site, the cause of the current problems inside Royal Mail is directly linked to the liberalisation of the postal market.

This in turn has caused Royal Mail’s market to be eroded by cream skimming competitors such as DHL and TNT. Both those organisations are, ironically, owned by the German and Dutch post offices respectively.

Royal Mail’s Universal Service Obligation (USO) — which is a legislative order to deliver mail to every address in Britain at a uniform price — means that the service can never be profitable.

In other words, the delivery of mail to all houses in Britain cannot be “made viable” and then sold off. Royal Mail simply cannot be privatised because no businessperson in their right mind would buy it.

It is significant that even in the United States of America, the post office remains a branch of government. The United States Postal Service (USPS) is wholly owned by the American government and controlled by Presidential appointees and the Postmaster General. If the Americans cannot privatise their post office, what chance does Britain have?

The only way that Royal Mail could ever be made profitable would be if its services were slashed and no deliveries took place outside of the major urban areas.

This would result in the loss of a mail service to millions of people, unless they were prepared to pay delivery costs outside of these major areas of around £20 per letter.

In spite of this USO and its implications, successive Tory and Labour governments have allowed Royal Mail to lose entire segments of its most profitable routes to private market competitors who have cherry picked certain areas without the obligation of having to deliver to all parts of the country.

The result has been an uneven playing field which has been disastrous for Royal Mail. It has been forced into bizarre compromises to keep up mail flows such as the mind-boggling “Downstream Access” service.

This allows private contractors such as TNT to win large mail contracts and feed the mail back into the Royal Mail delivery system at less than 40 percent of the normal delivery price.

Thousands of post offices have been closed in this austerity drive, and many more are threatened with closure.

In the midst of all this madness, the Tories have now announced that they will totally privatise Royal Mail as way of supposedly getting rid of the problem — which they created in the first place.

British people can therefore look forward to a Conservative administration which will finally destroy the proud tradition of Royal Mail and its universal delivery service which goes all the way back to 1840.

The British National Party, on the other hand, argues that Royal Mail is a much needed social service which can pay for itself, as it used to — provided that its market is protected.

A BNP government would protect Royal Mail’s market by preventing foreign competitors from ‘cherry picking’ its most viable routes.

Once that is done, the underlying reasons for the current unpleasant and disruptive strikes would largely vanish.

Immigration: Labour Party Is Guilty of Breach of UN Declaration on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights

A confession by a Labour Party spin doctor that Britain has been deliberately flooded with Third World immigrants has placed that party squarely in the dock as having breached the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).

In an article published in a daily newspaper yesterday, Labour Party speechwriter and government advisor Andrew Neather said the mass Third World immigration invasion to which Britain has been subjected was a deliberate plan to “help socially engineer a truly multicultural country.”

Mr Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said the policy had been decided upon after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office, in 2001.

Mr Neather, who still fully supports this policy, went on to say that Labour Party leaders had not talked about it because they feared a backlash from their own voters. A conspiracy of silence had therefore descended on the policy.

Unfortunately for Mr Neather and his fellow conspirators, that which they feared so much has now happened. Ordinary British people have woken up to the fact that they are being dispossessed of their country by waves of Third World colonisers.

This is the primary reason for the increased support for the British National Party — and the media’s obsessive attempts to smear Nick Griffin.

According to the accepted international definition, the term “indigenous people” is used to describe any ethnic group of people who inhabit a geographic region with which they have the earliest known historical connection.

The Scots, Irish, English and Welsh people are the indigenous people of the British Isles.

In the same way, the black African people are the indigenous people of much of Africa. The Han Chinese people are the indigenous folk of China, and the Jómon and Ainu people are the indigenous population of Japan.

The 2007 United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states that all indigenous peoples have the right not to be dispossessed of their lands.

Article 2 of the UNDRIP states that “Indigenous peoples and individuals are free and equal to all other peoples and individuals and have the right to be free from any kind of discrimination, in the exercise of their rights, in particular that based on their indigenous origin or identity.”

The affirmative action programmes and the upcoming Equality Act, driven by the Labour Party, which institutionalises discrimination against indigenous British white males in favour of all other groups, is clearly contradictory to the UNDRIP.

Article 3 of the UNDRIP states that “Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.”

The policy of mass immigration, as pursued by successive Tory and Labour governments, is in clear breach of this section of the UNDRIP. Mass immigration leads to the displacement of the indigenous British people and culture. The Islamification of Britain and the imposition of foreign legal systems, such as sharia law, are the most visible signs of this destruction or replacement of the indigenous culture. There are however, many others.

Article 3, part 2 of the UNDRIP says that states shall “provide effective mechanisms for prevention of, and redress for:

(a) Any action which has the aim or effect of depriving them of their integrity as distinct peoples, or of their cultural values or ethnic identities;

(b) Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources.

(c) Any form of forced population transfer which has the aim or effect of violating or undermining any of their rights;

(d) Any form of forced assimilation or integration;

(e) Any form of propaganda designed to promote or incite racial or ethnic discrimination directed against them.”

The Labour Party’s policies are an open and obvious breach of this UN-sanctioned charter. It is worthwhile bearing in mind, however, that the Conservative Party is equally to blame, as the immigration problem stems back to the time when that party was in government as well.

Only the British National Party stands squarely and openly for the rights of the indigenous people of this country. No amount of vilification or slander from the mass media or the old parties can hide this fact — and this is why support for the BNP grows in leaps and bounds with each passing minute.

Guardian Technology Editor Incites Illegal Hacking of BNP Website

The technology editor of the far left extremist rag, The Guardian, has openly called for the illegal hacking of the BNP website on his blog which is hosted by his employers.

In a posting on his blog called “You decide: should you hack that hateful party's website?” Charles Arthur says that a “friend who's quite into hacking” says that he has “found a flaw in the website of a political party whose views he detests.”

Although he does not name the party, he adds that its “leader might have appeared on a high-profile television programme recently.”

The incitement comes in the next two paragraphs: “The flaw, your friend explains, would let you hack into the site and change everything around. Then you, with your expertise, could change the front page, leave scripts that would capture login details, pretty much anything. Maybe there would even be some useful databases hanging around there.

“You're interested -- but the Computer Misuse Act doesn't have a public interest defence, and you're unsure whether your friend has the hacking chops to do this undetected. Then again, that leering face on the website is soooo annoying...

What do you do?”

The post is signed as follows: “Posted by Charles Arthur Friday 23 October 2009 17.33 BST.”

This blatant incitement to commit a criminal act is clearly a contravention of part 2 of the Serious Crime Act, 2007, which has three new statutory offences of encouraging or assisting crime.

According to that act, sections 44 to 46, a person is guilty of an offence if he or she:

“44 Intentionally encourage[es] or assist[s] an offence

(1) A person commits an offence if --

(a) He does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and

(b) He intends to encourage or assist its commission.

(2) But he is not to be taken to have intended to encourage or assist the commission of an offence merely because such encouragement or assistance was a foreseeable consequence of his act.

45 Encouraging or assisting an offence believing it will be committed

A person commits an offence if --

(a) He does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence; and

(b) He believes --

(i) That the offence will be committed; and

(ii) That his act will encourage or assist its commission.

46 Encouraging or assisting offences believing one or more will be committed

(1) A person commits an offence if --

(a) He does an act capable of encouraging or assisting the commission of one or more of a number of offences; and

(b) He believes --

(i) That one or more of those offences will be committed (but has no belief as to which); and

(ii) That his act will encourage or assist the commission of one or more of them.

(2)It is immaterial for the purposes of subsection (1)(b)(ii) whether the person has any belief as to which offence will be encouraged or assisted.”

Relevant screenshots have been taken of the posting on The Guardian’s site and the matter is currently being referred to lawyers and the police for further action.

* Users of this website might expect minor disruptions while the technical web team takes measures to further secure this website. Readers who are offended by this incitement to commit an illegal act are encouraged to submit complaints directly to the Serious Organised Crime Agency.

The SOCA website contact page can be found here.

The Printed Media’s Programme for the Extermination of the British People Exposed by Their Hysteria

Editorial Comment -- The printed media’s hysterical Nazi-like smears and slander against British National Party leader Nick Griffin today have finally revealed their hatred for the indigenous population of this country.

The wall-to-wall coverage has included cartoons ranging from the pathetically childish (see The Daily Express portraying Mr Griffin as a devil) to the outright Nazi (see The Daily Mail comparing Mr Griffin and BNP supporters to rats emerging from a sewer -- a scene taken from the Nazi film Die Ewige Jude which showed Jews as rats emerging from a drain.

Many led with front page editorials personally attacking Mr Griffin and at least one quoted from a seriously mentally ill homosexual “right wing” lunatic while another printed even more fantasy from the serial liar Dominic Carmen.

All of this media coverage was directed against Mr Griffin personally -- and none of it was directed at the policies of the BNP.

The reason for this is obvious: the media are well aware of the BNP’s policies. They know that any objective attention given to the sensible, reasonable, rational and just policies can only result in an increase in support for the BNP.

Who could argue against an indigenous peoples’ right to be free from colonisation in their own homeland? This is at the core of the BNP’s immigration policy.

Who could argue against a foreign policy which seeks to put British interests first and would refrain from illegal and immoral wars? This is at the core of the BNP’s foreign policy.

Who could argue against welfare reform which is designed to educate our own people, put them back to work and end the dependency culture? This is at the core of the BNP social policy.

Who could argue against the halting of the £40 billion per day subsidy going to the European Union -- for which Britain gets back less than 70p in the pound? This is at the core of the BNP’s policy regarding the EU.

Who could argue against the halting of building on our green belts? The housing crisis is directly caused by immigration. This is at the core of the BNP’s environmental policy.

Who could argue against ending the ludicrous ‘asylum’ policy which breaks every international convention in the book and costs the taxpayers untold billions? This is at the core of the BNP’s asylum policy.

Who could argue against a policy which seeks to reintroduce discipline and Euro-centric education in our schools so that they once again can be the envy of the world? This is at the core of the BNP’s education policy.

And so on, ad infinitum.

The media know very well that these rational, correct and completely sane policies will appeal to the vast majority of voters. So they do not dare mention them.

Instead, the media focuses on Germany of 70 years ago, like some obsessed demon, in the hope that some ridiculous comments made in youthful ignorance are somehow more important than the very real dangers facing Britain today.

And what are these dangers?

-- The reality is that, thanks to decades of Tory and Labour misrule, Britain stands on the very precipice of being submerged under a Third World colonisation invasion, the likes of which are without parallel in all history.

-- Britain is utterly bankrupt. Our national debt is soon to reach 100 percent or more of our GDP. We stand before an economic collapse, without parallel in history.

-- All of our national assets have been stripped off and sold to merciless international financiers. The cost of living is rocketing, with utility bills rising in many cases by 140 percent or more since the Tory-initiated privatisation policy.

-- Britain has been denuded of its manufacturing base and heartland by total subservience to internationalism. Labour Party policies have seen British industries sold to Indian companies, who then demand subsidies from the British taxpayer to keep those same companies afloat. More often than not, these factories have been literally shipped, lock, stock and barrel, to the Far East.

-- Finally, our independence and freedom as a sovereign nation, for which so many British people made the ultimate sacrifice in two bloody World Wars, is about to be sacrificed to the European Union.

There is no possible way that the newspaper editors can be ignorant of any of these dangers. They are blatant, in-your-face, facts.

Yet all they can talk about is the supposed evilness of Nick Griffin and the BNP.

By their silent acquiescence to the extermination of all that is Britain, they are part of that process.

They are just as guilty as the mad Communist Party weirdo freaks who attacked the police outside the BBC studios.

They are just as guilty as the three-in-one Tweedledee-Tweedledum Labour-Tory-Lib-Dem party.

In short, the media are guilty of treason to this nation, its people, its heritage and its destiny.

Thank heavens that the Internet has sounded the death knell to the printed filth which has for too long masqueraded as “public opinion.” We look forward to the day when the last of these filthy rags goes bankrupt.

Lynch Mob Question Time Becomes Biggest Recruitment Night Ever for BNP – 30% Increase in Membership Interest

The staggeringly biased lynch mob Question Time broadcast on BBC 1 has turned into the single biggest recruitment night in the British National Party’s history, with no less than 3,000 new people registering to be signed up as members when the current recruitment freeze ends.

This figure represents the single largest block of new membership expressions of interest ever, and will, once formally signed up, have boosted party membership by nearly 30 percent.

The BBC broke every rule in its book, even changing the format of the show to allow a hand-picked mob to use up the entire hour to relentlessly attack BNP leader Nick Griffin. Even the supposed moderator, David Dimbleby, joined in the attack, refusing to allow Mr Griffin to answer a single question in full -- despite letting other panellists ramble on for minutes at a time.

Mr Griffin said this morning that he was going to submit a formal complaint and a Freedom of Information Act request to have the preparatory papers for the show exposed to the public.

“There we will see that the BBC not only changed the format of the show, but that the questions were primed to be a barrage of lies disguised as statements,” Mr Griffin said.

The normal format of the show is to discuss issues of the day. Last night’s show was merely a prepared bear pit with a hostile hand-picked audience and panel, exactly as Mr Griffin had earlier predicted it would be.

At one stage, the ‘moderator’ allowed three highly charged questions in a row attacking Mr Griffin. When the BNP leader started to answer the first one, Mr Dimbleby interrupted and refused to let Mr Griffin continue his answer or even begin to answer the other two.

"People wanted to see me and hear me talking about things such as the postal strike. One or two questions about what a ‘wicked man’ I am, fair enough, but the whole programme, that was absurd,” Mr Griffin said.

In addition to the complaint he would be lodging over the show, Mr Griffin called for the entire event to be “done again. But let’s do it properly this time,” he said.

Mr Griffin said the viewing public had tuned in, wanting to hear the BNP’s policies and views on immigration, the postal strike, the illegal war in Afghanistan and other issues of the day.

“Instead they got none of that, merely a list of statements, almost none of which were even questions,” Mr Griffin said.

“I could also sit and prepare an hour of statements about other panel members if given the opportunity,” he said. “I could say that Mr Jack Straw was a member of the Young Communist League as a student.

“I could say that ‘Baroness’ Warsi has never been elected to anything and was told to stand down in Dewsbury by her own party because they wanted a white person as candidate.

“If I had to abuse the public broadcaster to do that, they would squeal like pigs. Yet this was exactly what was done to me,” Mr Griffin said.

He added that the programme should have been filmed somewhere else because London was "not my country any more. Why not come down and do it in Thurrock, do it in Stoke, do it in Burnley?

"Do it somewhere where significant numbers of English and British people still live, somewhere where they haven't been ethnically cleansed from their own country."

Mr Griffin said that the biased nature of the programme was obvious to all viewers and that this would generate further support for the BNP as it was now clear to all exactly how the other parties gladly teamed up against him.

* The BBC said it had received more than 350 complaints after the show was broadcast by midday today -- the bulk of which accused the show of being biased against the BNP and/or Mr Griffin.

* £5,300 was raised in donations over the party’s web site. This does not include the call centre, whose figures are not yet available. The combined hit rate climbed to just over 15 million for the past three days. The Alexa web ranking for 20 October placed the BNP website as the 11,468 most visited site in the world, a number which will certainly climb as the figures are updated.

Professional Liar Dominic Carmen Slanders Nick Griffin

Professional liar who libelled his own dead father, Dominic Carmen sums up what is worst about many journalists: a pathological liar who is unable to distinguish fact from reality and hatred from truth.

An insight into Mr Carmen’s mind can be found in the biography he penned about his late father, the famous QC George Carmen. In the book, titled No Ordinary Man, he described his father as a chain-smoking alcoholic with homosexual tendencies, who repeatedly beat all three of his wives.

In typical Dominic Carmen style, the only person who could counteract these slurs -- his father -- was dead. Mr Carmen made a nice little mint out of the ensuing scandal, obviously putting financial gain above the memory of his father.

In exactly the same way, Mr Carmen’s latest attack on the leader of the British National Party, Nick Griffin, is a concoction of hatred, lies, distortions and 2 percent of truth thrown in for good measure.

Mr Carmen’s vitriol includes a series of “quotes” from Mr Griffin, the vast majority of which are simply invented. Those that are accurate, are taken heavily out of context -- but little more is to be expected from a man who makes money out of slandering his own father.

Not only is Mr Carmen a liar, but he is also an incompetent journalist even when it comes to the most basic non-political facts.

According to one of his scribblings, he was given rhubarb pie at the Griffin residence while supposedly interviewing the BNP leader. Yet Mrs Griffin is actually allergic to rhubarb, and that foodstuff never enters the Griffin household as a result.

“These and many other blatantly factual errors show that Mr Carman is incapable of even the most basic journalistic ability,” Mr Griffin told BNP News.

“His latest attack is full of the most outrageous lies and distortions which are not even worth commenting on in detail,” Mr Griffin said. “The fact that a daily newspaper sees fit to reprint his pathological lies is another serious issue, which might yet be a matter for legal proceedings.”

Tories and Labour Are “Dishonest” over Immigration, Says Tory and Labour MPs

The Tory and the Labour parties have been dishonest to the public over immigration, Winston Churchill’s grandson, Tory MP Nicholas Soames and Frank Field, former Labour cabinet minister, have said. “So much for the new era of honesty in politics,” the two said in a statement today.

“The Cross Parliamentary Committee for Balanced Migration” -- which is merely a Tory and Labour front organisation to try and ward off the British National Party -- also admitted that the BNP is right on immigration.

In a joint statement today, Mr Soames and Mr Field said that Conservative and Labour “cowardice on immigration has allowed the BNP to flourish.”

Referring to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) figures released yesterday which showed that Britain is being utterly overrun by millions of Third World invaders, the two MPs said that “traditionally, a major characteristic of this country was the stability of our population.

“In fact, up until the mid-eighties more people left than wished to come here to live. Twenty-five years later the picture has been transformed: the population has grown by more than 4.4 million. How has this happened?” they asked.

They point out, quit accurately, that it was the last Conservative Party government which abolished the need to keep note of who was leaving Britain for Europe and the present Labour government “abolished the same check on those going to the rest of the world. The message was clear: Britain had no interest in challenging people who stayed beyond their allotted time.”

Most importantly, they continued, the present Government “has acted as a recruiting sergeant to enrol workers from abroad.”

According to the two old party men, ministers had claimed before the expansion of the EU that no more than 13,000 would come each year from the new countries to find work in Britain.

“All too quickly the numbers swelled towards a million. But the jokes about Polish plumbers have hidden a key fact: two thirds of immigration comes from outside Europe, and is of people who want to make our country their home for good,” they said.

“England is being fundamentally changed. All too many schools report that English is not the first language for the vast majority of students.

“Yesterday's statistics show that, over time, the increase in population will to an even greater degree be down to those coming here and their offspring. We have failed fully to integrate many of our newcomers: this shift will further tilt the balance away from a cohesive national identity,” they admitted.

The two men then admitted that both Tory and Labour parties were simply ignoring this most critical of issues.

“Rather than use its energies to control these waves of immigration, the Government has instead clamped down on any public debate about the issue; it has studiously avoided seeking voter approval for the changes Britain has undergone.

“Gordon Brown's 6,435-word address to the Labour Party conference last month contained a mere 83 words about immigration. At the Conservative conference, David Cameron offered a mere 58 words out of 6,387. So much for the new era of honesty in politics,” they admitted.

“Immigration now accounts for 40 percent of new households formed, just as the waiting list for social housing in England tops 1.8 million, an incredible 80 percent increase in the past six years,” they said, before whining on about how the BNP was growing because their own parties refused to address any of these issues.

The truth is that the Tory and Labour parties are fully committed to the multicultural disaster. For that reason, they will ignore its consequences and refuse to address any of the issues which Mr Soames and Mr Fields raise.

Are there any honest people left in the Tory or Labour parties? It would appear not.

A Letter to BNP Supporters from Nick Griffin on the Eve of Question Time

Fellow British Patriot

Question Time is scheduled for 10.35pm tonight and will be a milestone in the indomitable march of the British National Party towards saving our country.

Our violent opponents on the far left have promised to lay siege and barricade the studio venue, because they know only too well that this could be THE key moment that propels the BNP into the big time.

Never before have we had the chance to present our patriotic, common sense solutions to Britain's nightmare situation to the public at large in such a prominent fashion.

However, members and supporters must be aware that this show will be a stage-managed farce organised in a specific way to leave several impressions:

-- The audience will be hand-picked and overtly hostile -- thus giving the impression that the British people at large must be hostile to BNP views.

-- The panellists will be overtly hostile; even the non-political guests will be hostile. Everyone will be hostile -- this will leave the impression to non-informed viewers that BNP views have minority status.

-- I will, no doubt, be interrupted, shouted down, slandered, put on the spot, and subjected to a scrutiny that would be a thousand times more intense than anything directed at other panellists.

It will, in other words, be political blood sport.

But I am relishing this opportunity, and I know that, despite the stage-managed hostile audience and panellists, YOU, the ordinary members, supporters and voters of the BNP, will be in the studio with me as I take on the corrupt, treacherous swine destroying our beautiful island nation.

Tories Announce Discrimination in Favour of Women -- But Condemn BNP for Being in Favour of Indigenous Brits

“If the Conservative Party is permitted to discriminate in terms of involvement in favour of women, the BNP must be permitted to discriminate in terms of involvement in favour of white working class people.”

This entirely accurate assessment of Tory and Commission for Racial Equality hypocrisy was made yesterday by a leading poster on the Conservative Party home website.

Writing under the pen name “Melanchthon,” the Tory writer points out that the recent announcement by Conservative Party leader David Cameron that he will actively discriminate against white males in candidate lists has implications for the Tories.

“The only difference between a political party that restricts involvement in certain activities to women and one that restricts involvement in certain activities to white working class people is that we feel tempted to approve of the first and to disapprove of the second,” writes the senior Tory blogger.

“But from the point of view of the liberal social arbitrator, that is precisely the sort of difference that must be ignored. If the Conservative Party is permitted to discriminate in terms of involvement in favour of women, the BNP must be permitted to discriminate in terms of involvement in favour of white working class people.

“For what cannot be allowed to pass would be for the Conservative Party to employ all-women shortlists, but for the law that applies to our rulers (to political parties) to be different from that applying to the rest of us, for the law itself to discriminate in its treatment of men and women, and for the law to permit only those forms of discrimination we approve of, forbidding those that we (today) dislike. What's it to be?” the blogger concludes.

Of course, the Commission for Racial Equality race Gestapo, who are endorsed by Mr Cameron and the Tories, have been as quiet as a morgue over the announcement by the Conservatives that they will discriminate against white males.

Making the announcement in Parliament, Mr Cameron said under-representation of women and ethnic minorities was a "real problem for Parliament and it's been an even greater problem for my party.”

The announcement of all female candidate lists by the Tory leader is yet another 180 degree swing by Mr Cameron. Previously he had condemned all-women shortlists as a step too far.

Even Tory MP Ann Widdecombe dismissed the notion, saying that Mr Cameron’s latest idea was "appalling" and would make women MPs "second class citizens."

Mr Cameron made his comments as he, Gordon Brown and Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg appeared before a Speaker's Conference inquiry by MPs looking at how to “increase the representation of women, ethnic minorities, homosexuals and disabled people in the Commons.”

The irony of this inquiry is completely lost on that bunch of lying hypocrites. All those parties are in favour of the continued Third World immigration invasion which, if left unchecked, will result in the total Islamification of Britain.

Once that occurs, there will be no “homosexual rights” or even any democracy. These inherently Western concepts are dismissed as “decadent” under Sharia law which will be Britain’s future under the Lib-Lab-Con regime.

The Ethnic Cleansing of Britain

Indigenous white British people are being systematically ethnically cleansed from this nation by a flood of 300,000 Third World immigrants arriving here each year.

At this rate, Britain’s population will reach 70 million by 2029. Of this figure, at least two thirds will be the result of immigration. The majority of the rest of the increase will be due to the higher reproduction rates of those Third Worlders already present.

Every year 425,000 more immigrants settle in total, equivalent to a city the size of Bristol. The staggering growth rate means that in just 24 years, the population will increase by 10 million.

The new figures, based on data provided by the Office for National Statistics (ONS), shows that the population increase will take less than half the time to reach 70 million as what it took to go from 50 to 60 million between 1948 and 2005.

In addition, the population of “pensionable age” will rise by 32 percent over the next 25 years to 15.6 million, and the number aged over 85 will double to 3.3 million. These will be overwhelmingly white, and the younger generation overwhelmingly nonwhite.

By 2033, the population of England will be almost as large as the current populations of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland combined.

An August 2008 ONS report showed that nearly 25 percent of all babies born in Britain were from ‘foreign’ mothers. The ONS said that 758,000 babies were born in Britain in 2007, and that births to foreign-born mothers rose to 160,340, or 23 percent of all live births.

More than half of all births in some towns and cities, including London (54%), Slough (56%) and Luton (51%), were to non-UK born mothers. This figure peaks at 75 percent in the London borough of Newham.

As shocking as these figures are, they still do not reveal the full picture of the demographic change underway. The ONS report did not say how many of the ‘non-foreign’ mothers were in fact of non-European immigrant origin.

As the key areas reporting the biggest baby boom were London, West Midlands, Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire -- all areas of long-settled Afro-Caribbean and Asian immigrants, it is highly likely that once these figures are added to the 25 percent ‘foreign’ birth rate, then as many as 50 percent of all babies born in Britain in 2008 were of Third World origin.

The ONS population report states that, on average, ‘foreign’ women have 2.5 children each, rising to 3.9 for those from Bangladesh and almost five for Pakistani women.

This fast-moving trend means that babies born to immigrant mothers are set to become the main driver of Britain’s population growth within the next few years, taking over from immigration itself.

It is clear that unless the Third Wold immigration invasion is not only halted, but also reversed, Britain will be submerged well within the next 30 or 40 years to become a majority Third World nation.

Only the British National Party stands between this catastrophe and you.

Recommended reading: The Immigration Invasion: How Third World Immigration is Destroying the First World and What Must be Done to Stop It, by Arthur Kemp. This is a shocking book detailing the full extent of the Third World immigration wave which is swamping the Western world. Using the latest numbers and projections, it explains why Third World immigration will destroy the First World, with individual chapters on Britain, Europe, Russia, Canada, the USA, Australia and New Zealand. It shows that, if left unchecked, the First World will be overrun within the next 50 years. Softcover, 140 pp. £10.95 Click here to order.

Britain Is Being Colonised: In Excess of 20% of all Residents Are of Foreign Origin

Britain is being colonised by the Third World, with at least twenty percent of the resident population either born overseas or descendants of foreign-born parents.

The vast majority of these foreign-born residents are of Third World extraction.

According to figures just released by the Office for National Statistics, at least eleven percent of all people living in Britain today were born overseas. This figure does not include their second or third generation children.

If these descendants of foreign-born residents are included, the total non-indigenous British population is easily double the official figure and well in excess of twenty percent.

The figures show that more than one in every eight people in England was born abroad. In the middle of last year there were 6,486,000 people in Britain who were born abroad, with just over six million of them in England.

The vast majority of the population increase is not from Eastern Europe. The numbers of Eastern Europeans living in Britain has gone up by between 400,000 and 500,000, while the ranks of those in Britain who were born outside Europe have swelled by just under 700,000.

The foreign-born population rose by 290,000 last year and has risen by an average of 313,000 each year since 2004.

The Labour Force Survey, from which the information has been obtained, also fails to include people who live in hotels, boarding houses, hostels or caravan sites, as large numbers of migrants do. Nor does it include students in halls of residence.

Sir Andrew Green, head of the Migrationwatch think tank, said the new figures were “cause for real concern and heralded a population explosion.”

Now more than ever, British voters need to understand that they are being colonised. Unless they act decisively to halt this mass immigration wave, Britain and its thousands of years of culture, history and tradition will be submerged under the immigration invasion.

The time has never been more important to vote BNP, the only party committed to keeping Britain British.

Get involved and get active now — before it is too late.

Join the BNP by using the links provided to the right, or donate to the party’s election fighting fund now. Use the link on the grey side panel to the left. Do it now – the future of your children depends on it.

At Nuremberg, They Hanged the Politicians and Generals for War Crimes

Those Tory generals who today attacked the British National Party should remember that at the Nuremberg Trials, the politicians and generals accused of waging illegal aggressive wars were all charged — and hanged — together.

This was the reaction of Nick Griffin MEP to the announcement that Tory lackeys Sir Richard Dannatt and Sir Mike Jackson had broken all military protocol with their statement attacking the BNP.

Mr Griffin also pointed out that it was under Sir Richard’s tenure as Chief of the General Staff that the British Army put a limit on the number of serving foreign troops so as to preserve the “British essence” of that force.

“There is a prima facie case for charging Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, William Hague and David Cameron with waging aggressive war against Iraq,” Mr Griffin said.

“The Nuremberg War Crimes Trials set the precedent when the leaders of Nazi Germany were charged with invading other countries which represented no military threat to Germany.

“Along with the political leadership of Nazi Germany, the chiefs of staff of the German army, Alfred Jodl and Wilhelm Keitel, were also charged with waging aggressive war.

“Sir Richard and Sir Mike fall squarely into this bracket, and they must not think that they will escape culpability for pursuing the illegal wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” Mr Griffin said.

“These two gentlemen are Tories who have seen the traditional Conservative vote in the army, from private level up to senior officers, dissolve away and turn into BNP votes,” he said.

“These same generals said nothing when the news broke that Tory and Labour politicians were spending millions on personal expenses courtesy of the taxpayer, despite the army being underfunded.

“Sir Richard said nothing when Mr Cameron charged the taxpayer £680 to clear wisteria from his house’s chimney. Sir Richard said nothing when Jack Straw charged the taxpayer £8000 for a new plasma screen TV.

“Sir Richard said nothing about the fact that low-paid British soldiers have to buy their own kit because the Government has deliberately underfunded the army, despite sending our soldiers to foreign conflicts which have nothing to do with us.

“Yet now Sir Richard sees fit to wade into the public arena with a statement about the BNP. This exposes his typical disgusting Tory hypocrisy and his utter disregard for the ordinary British soldier,” Mr Griffin said.

“It is ironic that in September 2008, the British Army under Sir Richard’s watch, issued instructions to limit the number of foreign recruits,” Mr Griffin continued.

“At the time, official army documents said that the nation must maintain ‘Armed Forces which are predominantly British and whose members reflect and share the culture and values of British society’.

“This is BNP policy, as endorsed by Sir Richard when Chief of Staff. Yet now, because he has been given a job with the Tory party, these same policies are now reprehensible in his eyes.

“This hysterical attack on the BNP is nothing but a dying Tory toady gasp as the ordinary brave and loyal soldiers turn their backs on that party,” Mr Griffin said.

* Mr Griffin also dismissed as “sour grapes” complaints about the use of the Spitfire and quotes from Winston Churchill during BNP campaigns.

“The Spitfire represents the British fighting spirit against Continental totalitarianism. Winston Churchill’s comments on Islam, the European Union and unrestricted Third World immigration are the same as BNP policy, and he would have been expelled from today’s Tories for those views,” Mr Griffin said.

* Mr Griffin also dismissed as “disgusting” the launch of a Poppy Day appeal by Gordon Brown today.

“The Poppy Day appeal is supposed to go to help maimed and injured ex-servicemen, Mr Griffin said. “Mr Brown is the one who has sent our soldiers to war in unfit-for-service vehicles. He is the primary cause of so many injured soldiers in the first place. It is outrageous.”

Mr Griffin said he continued to wear a Poppy Day badge because he was asked to do so by injured soldiers, black and white, at the Birmingham Selly Oak military hospital. He was requested to do so to highlight the fact that these soldiers are charged money to watch television despite being bed-ridden while recuperating from serious wounds.

“I will not stop wearing my poppy badge until this disgrace is rectified,” Mr Griffin said. “This is something else ignored by Tory General Sir Richard who is totally out of touch with the rest of the army.”

* Both Sir Richard and Sir Mike received BNP information packs during the run-up to the June elections.